The Role of Mobilizing Teacher Education in Efforts to Improve the Quality of Teacher

Authors

  • Intan Nur Anggraeni Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rugaiyah Rugaiyah Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46963/asatiza.v4i1.842

Keywords:

Driving Teacher Education, Education, Teacher, Teacher Quality, Teacher Competence

Abstract

The quality of teachers tends to decline in this modern era; most teachers need more professionalism to carry out their duties. This is reflected in the low competence of the teacher. The Teacher Competency Test (UKG) conducted on Indonesian teachers showed unsatisfactory results. In addition, the decline in teacher quality can also be caused by several factors, including a lack of knowledge about technology, lack of time discipline, and the negative impact of globalization. The purpose of this study is to provide an understanding that the existence of the Teacher Mobilization Education Program is based on efforts to improve teacher quality. This research uses a qualitative approach with the literature study or literature review method. Data were collected by reviewing the official websites of Google Scholar, Research Gate, sign online and the Ministry of Education Culture Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia, with the keyword quality of teacher, teacher competence, teacher and obtained the data about teacher mobilization. The study results a show that teacher mobilization education can help improve the quality of teachers by increasing their competence. Mobilizing teacher education can create active, inclusive, capable, innovative, and sustainable teacher learning habits to support students' learning process. Education is inseparable from the role of the teacher as a role model and leader in learning. This government-initiated program can upgrade the quality of teachers, not only serving as teachers but as trainers and activators for other teachers in the context of developing creative, innovative, and student-centered learning. The driving teacher education program makes teachers more adaptive to the various changes they face with the times. It can cultivate the best learning methods based on existing technology. This study recommends that teachers continue to develop their quality through education and training to face future challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arzfi, B. P., Ananda, R., Putri, V. M., Gistituati, N., & Rusdinal. (2022). Implementasi supervisi oleh kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan kompetensi pedagogik guru di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3174

Clarke, L., & McFlynn, P. (2019). All animals learn, but only humans teach: The professional place of teacher educators. Education Sciences, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030192

Cooper, T. (2019). Rethinking teaching excellence in Australian higher education. International Journal of Comparative Education and Development, 21(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-10-2018-0038

Farhan, A., Herliana, F., Evendi, E., Devy, N. K., & Mauliza, F. (2021). The implementation of “Guru Penggerak” (Organizer Teachers) Concept to innovation of the discussion methods in thermodynamics course. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.07101

Febry, O., Santi, D. E., & Muhid, A. (2022). Pendekatan pembelajaran heutagogy untuk meningkatkan kreativitas siswa: Systematic literature review. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v13i2.10532

Firdaus, F., Muazza, M., Rosmiati, R., & Astuti, D. (2022). Pengaruh supervisi akademik kepala sekolah dan kompetensi pedagogik guru terhadap kinerja guru Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 1793–1803. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2233

Fuad, N. (2021). Supervisi Pendidikan: Strategi Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan di Sekolah (Y. N. I. Sari, Ed.). PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Huda, M., Perianto, E., & Subarkah, E. (2021). Improving Education Quality of Elementary School in Indonesia: an Empirical Research 提高印度尼西 亚 小学的教育 质 量 : 一 项实证 研究.

Izza, A. Z., Falah, M., & Susilawati, S. (2020). Studi literatur: Problematika evaluasi pembelajaran dalam mencapai tujuan pendidikan di era merdeka belajar. Konferensi Ilmiah Pendidikan Universitas Pekalongan 2020, 10–15.

Kemdikbudristek. (2020). Guru Penggerak. Retrieved from https://sekolah.penggerak.kemdikbud.go.id/gurupenggerak/

Manula, J. (2022). Program pendidikan guru penggerak: Pijakan kurikulum merdeka sebagai implementasi merdeka belajar. Jurnal Pengajaran Dan Riset, 02(01), 34–43.

Murniarti, E., Sirait, S., & Sihotang, H. (2021). Implementation of hots-based learning and problem based learning during the pandemic of covid-19 in SMA Budi Mulia Jakarta. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(2), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.82.9727

Musa, S., Nurhayati, S., Jabar, R., Sulaimawan, D., & Fauziddin, M. (2022). Peran guru penggerak dalam meningkatkan pemerataan kualitas kinerja guru. Jurnal At-Tadbir: Media Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 6(5), 4239–4254. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i5.2624

Muthiah, N. (2021). Evaluasi Program Guru Penggerak. Indonesia Report, (November).

Nugroho, A. S., Suryanti, S., & Wiryanto, W. (2022b). Peningkatan Kualitas Guru, Sebanding dengan Peningkatan Pendidikan? Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 7758–7767. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3354

Prawitasari, B., & Suharto, N. (2020). The role of guru penggerak (Organizer teacher) in komunitas guru belajar (Teacher learning community). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 400(Icream 2019), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.145

Pribudhiana, R., Bin Don, Y., & Bin Yusof, M. R. (2021). Determining the influence of teacher quality toward teacher readiness in implementing Indonesian education policy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2021(93), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.14689/EJER.2021.93.18

Rahmawati, R., Siraj, A., & Achruh, A. (2021). Hubungan antara kompetensi guru dan budaya sekolah dengan kinerja guru. Idaarah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.24252/idaarah.v5i1.19001

Rencana Strategis Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 2020-2024. (2020). Rencana strategis kementrian pendidikan dan kebudayaan 2020-2024. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–129.

Riowati, N. H. Y. (2022). Peran guru penggerak pada merdeka belajar untuk memperbaiki mutu pendidikan di Indonesia. Journal of Education and Instruction, 5(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v5i1.3393

Rumetna, M. S. (2018). Pemanfaatan cloud computing pada dunia bisnis: Studi literatur. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 5(3), 305-314. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.201853595

Safrizal, S., Nurhafizah, N., Yulia, R., & Husnani, H. (2022). Analysis of guru penggerak programs as sustainable professional development for teachers. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 2135–2142. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.829

Sianipar, R., Sinaga, D., Butra-butar, Y. Y., Simamora, A. I., & Simanjuntak, R. D. (2022). Pengaruh kompetensi guru dan kesiapan belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran IPS SMA. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 6336–6342.

Sibagariang, D., Sihotang, H., Murniarti, E., Smk,), & Paramitha, P. (2021). Peran guru penggerak dalam pendidikan merdeka belajar di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 14(2), 88–99.

Sijabat, O. P., Manao, M. M., Situmorang, A. R., Hutauruk, A., & Panjaitan, S. (2022). Mengatur kualitas guru melalui program guru penggerak. Journal of Educational Learning and Innovation (ELIa), 2(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.46229/elia.v2i1.404

Snoek, M. (2021). Educating quality teachers: how teacher quality is understood in the Netherlands and its implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(3), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1931111

Sugiyarta SL, Ardhi Prabowo, Tsabit A. Ahmad, & Aji Purwinarko M.B. S. (2020). Identifikasi kemampuan guru sebagai guru penggerak di karesidenan Semarang. Jurnal Profesi Keguruan, 6(2), 215–221.

Suharjuddin. (2021). Evaluasi pengembangan keprofesian berkelanjutan dalam peningkatan kompetensi profesional pendidik. Kelola Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 8(2), 173–184.

Syukri, M., Studi, P., Pendidikan, A., & Pontianak, U. T. (2022). Evaluasi program guru penggerak di SMA Kabupaten Kubu Raya. XI, 2715–2723. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v11i9.57874

Tute, K. J., Suryani, L., & Aje, A. U. (2020). Pengaruh iklim kerja dan kualitas mengajar guru terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(4), 1326–1335. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.554

Wijaya, A., Mustofa, Moh. S., & Husain, F. (2020). Sosialisasi program merdeka belajar dan guru penggerak bagi guru SMPN 2 Kabupaten Maros. Jurnal Puruhita, 2(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.15294/puruhita.v2i1.42325

Yusuf, A. R., & Mukhadis, A. (2018). Model pengembangan profesionalitas guru sesuai tuntutan revitalisasi pendidikan vokasi di Indonesia. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v9i2.1613

Zed, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-30

How to Cite

Anggraeni, I. N., & Rugaiyah, R. (2023). The Role of Mobilizing Teacher Education in Efforts to Improve the Quality of Teacher . Asatiza: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.46963/asatiza.v4i1.842