Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Materi Penjumlahan Pecahan dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme

Authors

  • Taufiqur Rohman Pascasarjana, IAIN Salatiga, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
  • Paramita Ayu Ekasari Pascasarjana, IAIN Salatiga, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46963/mpgmi.v7i1.211

Keywords:

Learning outcomes, Constructivism, Mathematics

Abstract

The study aimed to answer how the Constructivism approach can improve students' learning outcomes of adding fraction material in fourth-grade students of Madrasah Ibtidayah Tukangan, Ampel District, Boyolali Regency, Academic Year 2015/2016. This Classroom Action Research was carried out in two cycles. Each cycle has four stages, namely planning, implementing, observing, and reflecting. The data collection methods used were post-test observation sheets and documentation. The findings of this study revealed that the implementation of the Constructivism Approach can improve students' mathematics learning outcomes in adding fractions. This increase occurred from the first, and second cycles with the results of the Pre-test and Post-test have increased. In the first cycle, the mean score of the pre-test was 61.67, while the post-test was 68.88. In the second cycle, the mean score of the pre-test was 75, and the post-test was 88.89. Therefore, the mean score of pre-test, and post-test was increased by 13.89 or 22.23%. The increase of the mean score on the Pre-test and Post-test showed that the Constructivism approach can improve student learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chotimah, H. (2018). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Konstruktivistik Pada Materi Sistem Gerak di SMKN 13 Kota Malang. Pionir, 1(1), 44-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.33477/bs.v2i1.145.

Dzamarah, S. B. (2010). Guru dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif; Suatu Pendekatan Teoritis Psikologis. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Heruman.(2010). Model Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Liana, D. (2020). Berpikir Kritis Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik. Mitra PGMI: Jurnal Kependidikan MI, 6(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.46963/mpgmi.v6i1.92.

Martinis, Y. (2008). Paradigma Pendidikan Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Gaung Persada.

Novia, T. R., & Kusumo, E. (2013). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Berbantuan Concept Map Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kimia Pada Siswa SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 7(1).

Nurlianti, N., & Napratilora, M. (2020). Pelaksanaan Metode Pembelajaran Picture And Picture Oleh Guru Fikih Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Al-Rasyid Simpang Tiga Sungai Luar Kecamatan Batang Tuaka. Mitra PGMI: Jurnal Kependidikan MI, 6(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.46963/mpgmi.v6i1.94.

Seputar Kuliah Matematika: Hasil penelusuran untuk Kelebihan dan Kelemahan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme. (n.d.). Retrieved January 21, 2021, from https://yunihandayani97.blogspot.com/search?q=Kelebihan+dan+Kelemahan+Pendekatan+Konstruktivisme

Sriyanti, L. (2013). Psikologi belajar. Yogyakarta: Ombak, 187.

Sriyanti, L., & Suwardi, M. E. (2009). Teori-teori belajar. STAIN Salatiga Pres.

Yulita, E. (2020). Penerapan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Pada Siswa Kelas III.B Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri Tembilahan Kecamatan Tembilahan. Mitra PGMI: Jurnal Kependidikan MI, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.46963/mpgmi.v6i1.91.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-25

How to Cite

Rohman, T., & Ekasari, P. A. (2021). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Materi Penjumlahan Pecahan dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme. Mitra PGMI: Jurnal Kependidikan MI, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.46963/mpgmi.v7i1.211