Pemberdayaan guru IPA: Integrasi strategi understanding by design untuk meningkatkan kompetensi profesional dalam mendesain rencana pembelajaran

Authors

  • Muhamad Arif Mahdiannur Program Studi Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9348-139X
  • Martini Martini Program Studi Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Dyah Astriani Program Studi Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Beni Setiawan Program Studi Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Qosyim Program Studi Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46963/ams.v5i2.2329

Keywords:

Teacher professional development, Understanding by design, Lesson plans, Science teachers

Abstract

Improving teachers' competence in designing learning is essential for the quality of education. Many teachers struggle to develop effective lesson plans. This program aims to enhance the competence of science teachers in junior high schools in East Java through a hybrid workshop (offline and online) using the Understanding by Design (UbD) approach. The target participants were members of the Science Teachers' Association (MGMP). The program's effectiveness was assessed using a one group pre-posttest design, analyzed with raincloud plots, and the shift in pretest-posttest scores was evaluated using histograms and contingency tables. The results showed that the majority of participants experienced improvement, with 80% shifting to higher performance categories. The workshop successfully assisted teachers in developing lesson plans that align with student characteristics and curriculum goals. The long-term impact of the program is the enhancement of science teachers' pedagogical and pedagogical content knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, M., Poggiali, D., Whitaker, K., Marshall, T. R., Van Langen, J., & Kievit, R. A. (2021). Raincloud plots: A multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. Wellcome Open Research, 4, 63. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.2

Bennett, S., Lockyer, L., & Agostinho, S. (2018). Towards sustainable technology‐enhanced innovation in higher education: Advancing learning design by understanding and supporting teacher design practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1014–1026. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12683

Betul Cebesoy, U., & Karisan, D. (2020). Teaching the role of forests in mitigating the effects of climate change using outdoor educational workshop. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–23. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2020.1799777

Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5–16. doi: 10.1177/0008125617745086

Cevikbas, M., König, J., & Rothland, M. (2024). Empirical research on teacher competence in mathematics lesson planning: Recent developments. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(1), 101–113. doi: 10.1007/s11858-023-01487-2

Christman, E., Miller, P., & Stewart, J. (2024). Beyond normalized gain: Improved comparison of physics educational outcomes. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 010123. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010123

Coletta, V. P., & Steinert, J. J. (2020). Why normalized gain should continue to be used in analyzing preinstruction and postinstruction scores on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010108. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010108

Didion, L., Toste, J. R., & Filderman, M. J. (2020). Teacher professional development and student reading achievement: A meta-analytic review of the effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(1), 29–66. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2019.1670884

Ferrarelli, P., & Iocchi, L. (2021). Learning Newtonian physics through programming robot experiments. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 789–824. doi: 10.1007/s10758-021-09508-3

Heikkilä, M. (2021). Finnish teachers’ participation in local curriculum development: A study of processes in five school contexts. Policy Futures in Education, 19(7), 752–769. doi: 10.1177/1478210320967816

Jha, N. K., Banerjee, N., & Moller, S. (2020). Assessing the role of teachers’ unions in the adoption of accountability policies in public education. The Urban Review, 52(2), 299–330. doi: 10.1007/s11256-019-00529-y

König, J., Krepf, M., Bremerich-Vos, A., & Buchholtz, C. (2021). Meeting cognitive demands of lesson planning: Introducing the CODE-PLAN model to describe and analyze teachers’ planning competence. The Teacher Educator, 56(4), 466–487. doi: 10.1080/08878730.2021.1938324

Krzychała, S. (2020). Teacher responses to new pedagogical practices: A praxeological model for the study of teacher-driven school development. American Educational Research Journal, 57(3), 979–1013. doi: 10.3102/0002831219868461

Lasry, N., Guillemette, J., & Mazur, E. (2014). Two steps forward, one step back. Nature Physics, 10(6), 402–403. doi: 10.1038/nphys2988

Liang, M., Juliana, Mendoza, N. B., & Lim, C. P. (2023). Localizing teacher professional development at scale enabled by professional learning communities: A study of teacher learning centers in Indonesia. In W. O. Lee, P. Brown, A. L. Goodwin, & A. Green (Eds.), International Handbook on Education Development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 1107–1123). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-6887-7_136

Liang, W., To, J., & Lo, Y. Y. (2024). A journey towards teacher empowerment in differentiated instruction: Implications for a sustainable teacher professional development model. Asia Pacific Education Review. doi: 10.1007/s12564-024-09977-y

Liu, S., & Phelps, G. (2020). Does teacher learning last? Understanding how much teachers retain their knowledge after professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 537–550. doi: 10.1177/0022487119886290

Mahmood, M. S., Talafian, H., Shafer, D., Kuo, E., Lundsgaard, M., & Stelzer, T. (2024). Navigating socio‐emotional risk through comfort‐building in physics teacher professional development: A case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(9), 2223–2257. doi: 10.1002/tea.21949

Neuman, S. B., & Danielson, K. (2021). Enacting content-rich curriculum in early childhood: The role of teacher knowledge and pedagogy. Early Education and Development, 32(3), 443–458. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2020.1753463

Nichol, C., Chow, A., & Furtwengler, S. (2018). Year-long teacher professional development on fifth grade student science outcomes. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2099–2117. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1521027

Nuzzo, R. L. (2019). Histograms: A useful data analysis visualization. PM&R, 11(3), 309–312. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12145

Pan, H.-L. W., Chen, C.-H., & Wiens, P. D. (2022). Teacher professional development and practice of project-based learning in Taiwan: The moderating effect of self-efficacy. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2022.2114423

Pedaste, M., Leijen, Ä., Poom‐Valickis, K., & Eisenschmidt, E. (2019). Teacher professional standards to support teacher quality and learning in Estonia. European Journal of Education, 54(3), 389–399. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12346

Pereira, R., & Franco, M. (2022). Cooperation between universities and SMEs: A systematic literature review. Industry and Higher Education, 36(1), 37–50. doi: 10.1177/0950422221995114

Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305

Shao, P., Pan, Z., Meng, C., & Liu, M. (2024). Revealing pre-service teachers’ reflections regarding online practicum through the lens of TPACK. Education and Information Technologies. doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13053-8

Thao, N. P., Kieu, T. K., Schruefer, G., Nguyen, N.-A., Nguyen, Y. T. H., Vien Thong, N., … Van Hanh, N. (2022). Teachers’ competencies in education for sustainable development in the context of Vietnam. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(7), 1730–1748. doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-08-2021-0349

Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2011). The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. Alexandria, Va: ASCD.

Wilson, J. L. F. (2023). Using backward design to create a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive principles course. The Journal of Economic Education, 54(4), 440–452. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2023.2243910

Zhang, S., Ma, X., Xu, H., & Lu, J. (2024). The influence of mentorship in workplace on teachers’ professional development a meta-analysis based on 66 experiments. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 39(6), 815–831. doi: 10.1108/JMP-11-2022-0588

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Mahdiannur, M. A., Martini, M., Astriani, D., Setiawan, B., & Qosyim, A. (2024). Pemberdayaan guru IPA: Integrasi strategi understanding by design untuk meningkatkan kompetensi profesional dalam mendesain rencana pembelajaran. ABDIMASY: Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, 5(2), 136-149. https://doi.org/10.46963/ams.v5i2.2329