Pemberdayaan guru IPA: Integrasi strategi understanding by design untuk meningkatkan kompetensi profesional dalam mendesain rencana pembelajaran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46963/ams.v5i2.2329Keywords:
Teacher professional development, Understanding by design, Lesson plans, Science teachersAbstract
Improving teachers' competence in designing learning is essential for the quality of education. Many teachers struggle to develop effective lesson plans. This program aims to enhance the competence of science teachers in junior high schools in East Java through a hybrid workshop (offline and online) using the Understanding by Design (UbD) approach. The target participants were members of the Science Teachers' Association (MGMP). The program's effectiveness was assessed using a one group pre-posttest design, analyzed with raincloud plots, and the shift in pretest-posttest scores was evaluated using histograms and contingency tables. The results showed that the majority of participants experienced improvement, with 80% shifting to higher performance categories. The workshop successfully assisted teachers in developing lesson plans that align with student characteristics and curriculum goals. The long-term impact of the program is the enhancement of science teachers' pedagogical and pedagogical content knowledge.
Downloads
References
Allen, M., Poggiali, D., Whitaker, K., Marshall, T. R., Van Langen, J., & Kievit, R. A. (2021). Raincloud plots: A multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. Wellcome Open Research, 4, 63. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.2
Bennett, S., Lockyer, L., & Agostinho, S. (2018). Towards sustainable technology‐enhanced innovation in higher education: Advancing learning design by understanding and supporting teacher design practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1014–1026. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12683
Betul Cebesoy, U., & Karisan, D. (2020). Teaching the role of forests in mitigating the effects of climate change using outdoor educational workshop. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–23. doi: 10.1080/02635143.2020.1799777
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5–16. doi: 10.1177/0008125617745086
Cevikbas, M., König, J., & Rothland, M. (2024). Empirical research on teacher competence in mathematics lesson planning: Recent developments. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(1), 101–113. doi: 10.1007/s11858-023-01487-2
Christman, E., Miller, P., & Stewart, J. (2024). Beyond normalized gain: Improved comparison of physics educational outcomes. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 010123. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010123
Coletta, V. P., & Steinert, J. J. (2020). Why normalized gain should continue to be used in analyzing preinstruction and postinstruction scores on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 010108. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010108
Didion, L., Toste, J. R., & Filderman, M. J. (2020). Teacher professional development and student reading achievement: A meta-analytic review of the effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(1), 29–66. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2019.1670884
Ferrarelli, P., & Iocchi, L. (2021). Learning Newtonian physics through programming robot experiments. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 789–824. doi: 10.1007/s10758-021-09508-3
Heikkilä, M. (2021). Finnish teachers’ participation in local curriculum development: A study of processes in five school contexts. Policy Futures in Education, 19(7), 752–769. doi: 10.1177/1478210320967816
Jha, N. K., Banerjee, N., & Moller, S. (2020). Assessing the role of teachers’ unions in the adoption of accountability policies in public education. The Urban Review, 52(2), 299–330. doi: 10.1007/s11256-019-00529-y
König, J., Krepf, M., Bremerich-Vos, A., & Buchholtz, C. (2021). Meeting cognitive demands of lesson planning: Introducing the CODE-PLAN model to describe and analyze teachers’ planning competence. The Teacher Educator, 56(4), 466–487. doi: 10.1080/08878730.2021.1938324
Krzychała, S. (2020). Teacher responses to new pedagogical practices: A praxeological model for the study of teacher-driven school development. American Educational Research Journal, 57(3), 979–1013. doi: 10.3102/0002831219868461
Lasry, N., Guillemette, J., & Mazur, E. (2014). Two steps forward, one step back. Nature Physics, 10(6), 402–403. doi: 10.1038/nphys2988
Liang, M., Juliana, Mendoza, N. B., & Lim, C. P. (2023). Localizing teacher professional development at scale enabled by professional learning communities: A study of teacher learning centers in Indonesia. In W. O. Lee, P. Brown, A. L. Goodwin, & A. Green (Eds.), International Handbook on Education Development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 1107–1123). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-6887-7_136
Liang, W., To, J., & Lo, Y. Y. (2024). A journey towards teacher empowerment in differentiated instruction: Implications for a sustainable teacher professional development model. Asia Pacific Education Review. doi: 10.1007/s12564-024-09977-y
Liu, S., & Phelps, G. (2020). Does teacher learning last? Understanding how much teachers retain their knowledge after professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 537–550. doi: 10.1177/0022487119886290
Mahmood, M. S., Talafian, H., Shafer, D., Kuo, E., Lundsgaard, M., & Stelzer, T. (2024). Navigating socio‐emotional risk through comfort‐building in physics teacher professional development: A case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(9), 2223–2257. doi: 10.1002/tea.21949
Neuman, S. B., & Danielson, K. (2021). Enacting content-rich curriculum in early childhood: The role of teacher knowledge and pedagogy. Early Education and Development, 32(3), 443–458. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2020.1753463
Nichol, C., Chow, A., & Furtwengler, S. (2018). Year-long teacher professional development on fifth grade student science outcomes. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2099–2117. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1521027
Nuzzo, R. L. (2019). Histograms: A useful data analysis visualization. PM&R, 11(3), 309–312. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12145
Pan, H.-L. W., Chen, C.-H., & Wiens, P. D. (2022). Teacher professional development and practice of project-based learning in Taiwan: The moderating effect of self-efficacy. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/02188791.2022.2114423
Pedaste, M., Leijen, Ä., Poom‐Valickis, K., & Eisenschmidt, E. (2019). Teacher professional standards to support teacher quality and learning in Estonia. European Journal of Education, 54(3), 389–399. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12346
Pereira, R., & Franco, M. (2022). Cooperation between universities and SMEs: A systematic literature review. Industry and Higher Education, 36(1), 37–50. doi: 10.1177/0950422221995114
Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305
Shao, P., Pan, Z., Meng, C., & Liu, M. (2024). Revealing pre-service teachers’ reflections regarding online practicum through the lens of TPACK. Education and Information Technologies. doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-13053-8
Thao, N. P., Kieu, T. K., Schruefer, G., Nguyen, N.-A., Nguyen, Y. T. H., Vien Thong, N., … Van Hanh, N. (2022). Teachers’ competencies in education for sustainable development in the context of Vietnam. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(7), 1730–1748. doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-08-2021-0349
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2011). The understanding by design guide to creating high-quality units. Alexandria, Va: ASCD.
Wilson, J. L. F. (2023). Using backward design to create a more diverse, equitable, and inclusive principles course. The Journal of Economic Education, 54(4), 440–452. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2023.2243910
Zhang, S., Ma, X., Xu, H., & Lu, J. (2024). The influence of mentorship in workplace on teachers’ professional development a meta-analysis based on 66 experiments. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 39(6), 815–831. doi: 10.1108/JMP-11-2022-0588
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhamad Arif Mahdiannur, Martini Martini, Dyah Astriani, Beni Setiawan, Ahmad Qosyim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
2. The author grants the journal, right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution shareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License